Anthropic accuses Chinese AI labs of mining Claude as US debates AI chip exports
Back to Homeai

Anthropic accuses Chinese AI labs of mining Claude as US debates AI chip exports

February 23, 20262 views2 min read

Anthropic accuses Chinese AI labs of using 24,000 fake accounts to distill Claude's capabilities, as U.S. officials debate export controls on AI chips aimed at slowing China's progress.

Anthropic, the San Francisco-based AI company behind the popular Claude chatbot, has launched a public accusation against three Chinese AI labs, claiming they used thousands of fake accounts to extract and replicate Claude's capabilities. The allegations come as U.S. policymakers grapple with new export restrictions on advanced AI chips, aimed at curbing China's technological advancement.

Accusations of AI Data Harvesting

The company revealed that DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax allegedly created approximately 24,000 fake user accounts to interact with Claude and gather intelligence from its responses. This process, known as 'distillation,' involves systematically extracting knowledge and capabilities from a model to build a similar or superior system. Anthropic argues that this practice violates ethical guidelines and potentially breaches terms of service.

Broader Implications for AI Governance

This incident highlights the growing tensions between U.S. and Chinese AI development, especially as both nations vie for dominance in the rapidly evolving field. The U.S. government is currently debating export controls on AI chips and related technologies, with the aim of preventing China from accessing cutting-edge hardware that could accelerate its AI research. The accusations from Anthropic add another layer of complexity to these discussions, as they underscore the ethical and competitive challenges in the global AI landscape.

Industry Response and Future Outlook

Industry experts suggest that such practices may become more common as AI models become more powerful and valuable. The case raises questions about how to protect intellectual property in the AI era and whether current regulatory frameworks are sufficient. As both countries continue to invest heavily in AI, the tension over data access, model replication, and export controls is likely to intensify, potentially shaping the future of global AI development.

Anthropic has called for stronger international cooperation and clearer guidelines to prevent such practices from becoming widespread.

Related Articles