Current language model training leaves large parts of the internet on the table
Back to Home
ai

Current language model training leaves large parts of the internet on the table

February 28, 20262 views2 min read

A new study reveals that the tools used to extract web content for training large language models can significantly impact which parts of the internet are included in AI datasets. This inconsistency raises concerns about the representativeness and fairness of AI training data.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly shaping how we interact with technology, but new research reveals a significant gap in how these systems are trained. A study conducted by researchers from Apple, Stanford University, and the University of Washington has uncovered that the tools used to extract content from the web can dramatically influence which parts of the internet make it into training datasets. This finding raises important questions about the representativeness and completeness of the data that powers today’s AI systems.

HTML Extractors Shape the AI Landscape

The study focuses on HTML extractors—tools that parse web pages to extract text and other content for training LLMs. Researchers found that three widely used extractors—trafilatura, newspaper3k, and readability—produce markedly different outputs from the same web page. While one extractor might capture full article text, another might miss key sections or even exclude entire pages. This inconsistency means that different LLMs may be trained on vastly different subsets of the internet, potentially leading to skewed or incomplete knowledge representations.

Implications for AI Training and Accuracy

This discovery has significant implications for the development of AI systems. If models are trained on data that varies so widely depending on the extraction tool, it could result in inconsistent performance and biased outputs. The research highlights the need for more standardized and transparent data preprocessing methods in AI development. As LLMs become more integrated into critical applications—from healthcare to education—ensuring the comprehensiveness and fairness of training data becomes paramount. The findings also underscore a broader issue in AI research: the lack of standardization in data collection practices across the industry.

Looking Forward

While the study points to a clear problem, it also opens the door to potential solutions. Researchers suggest that adopting more uniform extraction techniques or creating hybrid approaches could help ensure that AI systems have access to a more complete and representative slice of the web. As the field of AI continues to evolve, the importance of data integrity and consistency will only grow. This research is a timely reminder that behind every powerful AI model lies a complex web of technical decisions that shape its capabilities and limitations.

Source: The Decoder

Related Articles